Skip to content

Conversation

@parameja1
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Update Q extension version being used in v2 and v3 SMD versions to use the latest 1.90 version which is needed to enable agentic flare chat for CodeEditor spaces in Sagemaker Unified Studio
  • The 1.89 version already contains the fix to update origin for SMUS here that is consumed on flare server side to trigger agentic chat

Type of Change

  • Image update - Bug fix
  • Image update - New feature
  • Image update - Breaking change
  • SMD image build tool update
  • Documentation update

Release Information

Does this change need to be included in patch version releases? By default, any pull requests will only be added to the next SMD image minor version release once they are merged in template folder. Only critical bug fix or security update should be applied to new patch versions of existed image minor versions.

  • Yes (Critical bug fix or security update)
  • No (New feature or non-critical change)
  • N/A (Not an image update)

If yes, please explain why:
[Explain the criticality of this change and why it should be included in patch releases]

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested with the marketplace q extension version in a CodeEditor SMUS space
image

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Test Screenshots (if applicable):

Related Issues

  1. feat(amazonq): update lsp clientname to support sagemaker unified studio case aws-toolkit-vscode#7817
  2. feat: add support for SMUS Q CodeEditor client to send MD IDE origin language-servers#2032

Additional Notes

[Any additional information that might be helpful for reviewers]

@parameja1 parameja1 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2025 21:25
@TRNWWZ TRNWWZ merged commit 7dd902f into aws:main Aug 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants